If you’re hoping for another stimulus-style check in the mail, don’t count on it. Talk of “tariff rebate checks” has surfaced in recent weeks — but the proposal is far from reality, and many Republicans are already rejecting it outright.
How the Idea Entered the Conversation
The notion of using tariff revenue to fund rebate checks first popped up in July when a reporter asked President Donald Trump whether such a plan was on the table. Trump responded that he was “thinking about a little rebate” for Americans at “a certain income level.”
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) quickly seized on the comment, introducing a bill that would provide $600 rebate checks to lower-income households, modeled after the 2020 stimulus programs. A family of four, for example, would receive at least $2,400.
Trump mentioned the possibility again at an August cabinet meeting, calling it a “dividend” for Americans — but both times, he stressed that he’d prefer to use tariff revenue to pay down the national debt rather than fund checks.
What Hawley’s Bill Would Do
Hawley’s legislation would redirect billions in tariff revenue toward working-class Americans. The bill phases out the rebate for:
-
Individuals earning above $75,000
-
Heads of household earning above $112,500
-
Joint filers earning above $150,000
The IRS reported that the second round of $600 pandemic stimulus checks cost $141 billion, so the math for Hawley’s bill is at least feasible if tariff revenues hit projections.
The Treasury has already collected over $100 billion in customs duties this year, and analysts estimate revenue could eventually exceed $500 billion annually under Trump’s tariff regime.
Why It Probably Won’t Happen
Despite Hawley’s push, most of his Republican colleagues aren’t on board. Several GOP senators told reporters they want tariff revenue to reduce debt, not fund rebates:
-
Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH): “It’ll never pass. We have a $37 trillion debt.”
-
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY): Called the idea “the dumbest” he’s ever heard, saying, “There is no rebate if there’s no money.”
-
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI): Would only support checks “when we have a surplus.”
-
Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY): Suggested using tariff revenue to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve instead.
Policy analysts are skeptical too. Tad DeHaven of the Cato Institute labeled it a “tax and redistribution scheme,” noting that consumers ultimately pay tariffs through higher prices — while the rebates would go only to select households.
Why Trump’s Position Matters
Trump himself has not proposed rebate checks. He only acknowledged the idea when asked, and in both instances, emphasized debt reduction as his primary goal. That mirrors past episodes — like when he briefly said he’d “consider” raising the minimum wage or supported the so-called “DOGE Dividend” — before letting the ideas fizzle out.
For now, the tariff rebate checks look less like policy and more like political messaging aimed at working-class voters.
The Bottom Line
-
Hawley’s $600 rebate plan could theoretically be funded by tariff revenue, but it faces stiff opposition within the GOP.
-
Trump has not endorsed the idea, and has repeatedly said tariff income should go toward reducing the $37 trillion national debt.
-
Even if the plan gained momentum, it would likely spark intense debate about whether rebates are genuine relief or just another redistribution scheme.
For now, Americans shouldn’t expect a tariff-funded rebate check to show up in their mailboxes anytime soon.
