Late October 2025 brought a sharp flare-up in U.S.–Canada trade relations after the Canadian province of Ontario aired a television advertisement featuring Ronald Reagan’s voice criticizing tariffs a campaign meant to highlight the impact of U.S. duties on Canadian goods. The reaction from Donald Trump’s administration was immediate and sweeping: Trump declared the end of all trade negotiations with Canada, citing the ad as “fraudulent” and interfering with U.S. policy.
Shortly afterward, Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford announced the ad campaign would be paused starting Monday, following discussions with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and at least one Canadian industry stakeholder. The move is positioned as a gesture to facilitate resumption of talks.
What the Ad Said and Why It Sparked a Crisis
The ad part of a roughly CAD $75 million (≈ USD $54 million) Ontario campaign aired on U.S. networks and included audio from Reagan’s 1987 radio address on “Free and Fair Trade.” The message emphasized that while tariffs may appeal initially, “over the long run such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer.”
While the Ontario government claims the audio is an unedited public-domain segment, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute objected, stating the ad used selective editing and that the province “did not seek nor receive permission” to use or edit Reagan’s remarks.
Trump’s public reaction was blunt:
“The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.”
— Donald Trump, October 24 2025
He followed up:
“TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. … ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.”
Canada’s Response and the State of Play
Premier Ford, acknowledging the fallout, said:
“We’ve achieved our goal, having reached U.S. audiences at the highest levels … Our intention was always to initiate a conversation about the kind of economy that Americans want to build and the impact of tariffs on workers and businesses.”
However, he also confirmed the campaign would pause after the upcoming World Series games, meaning some ads would still air over the weekend.
Prime Minister Mark Carney adopted a more cautious tone, noting Canada can’t control U.S. trade policy but remains ready to resume talks. He affirmed that Canada would continue efforts to diversify export markets beyond the U.S. in light of escalating pressure.
From a macro-economic angle, the stakes are high: Canada exports roughly three-quarters of its goods to the U.S., and the auto, steel, aluminum and lumber sectors are particularly vulnerable to disruptions in U.S. policy.
Why The Timing and Context Matter
-
Trade negotiations were already underway between Ottawa and Washington when this ad appeared meaning the fallout wasn’t merely symbolic, but immediately transactional.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court is also slated to hear a case that could determine Trump’s authority over certain tariffs, making the ad’s critique more than a provincial protest. The White House claimed the ad tried to influence that legal process.
-
Canadian provincial and federal leadership appear divided: while Ford has been vocal and confrontational, other provinces and the federal government are pushing for measured diplomacy.
What Comes Next
-
The next few weeks will reveal whether the pause in the ad campaign truly signals a thaw, or whether bigger structural disagreements remain unaddressed.
-
Industries in Canada are already recalibrating: supply-chain shifts, export diversification, and contingency planning are under way in response to the uncertainty.
-
From the U.S. side, there’s a message: media campaigns, especially those perceived as targeting U.S. policy or identity, may be treated as diplomatic provocations rather than public-relations tactics.
-
Observers will closely watch upcoming international forums (ASEAN/APEC) where Trump and Carney may meet whether informal engagements hold the potential for resolution.
A television advertisement often treated as a simple promotional push has set off a major rupture in one of the world’s closest trading relationships. When a provincial government chooses to confront another country’s tariff policy via a former president’s voice, diplomacy becomes headline-driven, and trade becomes emotionally charged.
In the end, Ontario’s decision to pause the campaign may help restore talks. But it also underscores how communication strategy, perception, and timing can escalate into full-scale economic disputes.
