In September 2025, technology founders across the United States were jolted awake by one of the most aggressive visa policy shifts in recent memory: a proclamation requiring a one-time $100,000 fee for new H-1B visa applications. The announcement triggered immediate panic in startup circles. Early-stage companies with tight budgets and global founders suddenly found their hiring calculus upended. In just days, stories emerged of visa holders being urged not to travel abroad, of companies halting visa sponsorships, and of geographic relocation for founders elsewhere.
But for many founders, this shock felt eerily familiar — as if a second wave of immigration disruption was looming. Many now ask: “Is there another shoe about to drop?” Are further regulations, restrictions, or hidden clauses waiting to slam the door on global talent?
In this article, I explore:
-
The recent visa policy shift and how it has reverberated through the startup ecosystem
-
Founders’ contingency reactions and adaptation strategies
-
Likely additional shocks or policy levers that could come next
-
The structural vulnerabilities of startups under migration uncertainty
-
What founders, investors, and policy watchers can do right now
The New H-1B Fee & Immediate Fallout
The Policy Change & Its Mechanics
On September 19, 2025, President Trump signed a proclamation requiring that any new H-1B visa petition submitted between September 21, 2025 and September 21, 2026 include a supplemental $100,000 fee.
Crucially:
-
The fee is one-time, not annual, and only applies to new applications (not renewals for existing visa holders).
-
The administration clarified that existing H-1B holders and renewals would be exempt.
-
However, many of the finer details (e.g. how “new” is defined, how audits or exemptions apply) remain murky, fueling deep uncertainty.
The scale is dramatic: compared to prior H-1B costs (application fees, legal costs, etc.), this is an outsized premium — a cost many startups simply cannot absorb.
Sector Reaction: Chaos, Confusion & Fracture
Founders reported immediate scramble:
-
Tech firms and legal counsel circulated advisories discouraging H-1B employees from traveling abroad lest they face reentry challenges.
-
Some companies paused future H-1B sponsorships altogether, especially startups with lean legal or immigration budgets.
-
Founders within the immigrant startup community began evaluating relocation, alternative jurisdictions, or exit strategies.
-
Canadian, and non-U.S. ecosystems sensed opportunity: several Canadian tech ventures moved to poach visa-endangered founders.
-
Investors flagged this as a material risk: many pre-seed and seed deals assume global hiring arcs and visa pathways. Some term sheets began incorporating visa risk clauses.
Even large companies expressed disappointment, warning that the sudden cost increase disproportionately burdens resource-constrained startups. The visa marketplace for early-stage teams now feels like shifting sand.
Founders in Survival Mode: Adaptations & Workarounds
For founders already on thin margins and lean teams, this visa shock is more than a nuisance — it's existential. Here’s how many are reacting.
1. Pause, Freeze & Deliberate
Many startups immediately paused hiring roles that would require H-1B sponsorship, or delayed expansion. Some froze opening new functional positions (engineering, design) to preserve cash.
2. Lean on Alternative Visa Categories
Some are pivoting toward alternate visa pathways — O-1 (extraordinary ability) for select hires, L-1 transfers, or exploring investor visas where applicable. But these are niche and prey to stricter scrutiny or higher thresholds.
3. Leaner Teams, More Outsourcing
Instead of on-shore visa hires, some founders are outsourcing to contractors abroad, using remote teams in more welcoming jurisdictions, or employing more part-time/global contributors who don’t need U.S. work authorization.
4. Founder Return Options & Geographic Moves
Some immigrant founders are rethinking their physical location. For instance, founders are considering base-shifting to Canada, Europe, India, or other startup hubs that offer more stable visa regimes.
5. Build Buffer Funds & Visa Reserves
Startups that anticipated immigration risk are now building buffer capital and legal reserves. Some are front-loading legal filings or applying earlier in fiscal cycles to preempt stricter rules.
6. Leverage Global Entities, Dual Entities
In more complex cases, startups establish subsidiary entities abroad or dual-entity models to allow professionals to be hired through foreign arms, then aligned with U.S. operations.
7. Engage in Advocacy & Policy Pressure
Founders and investor networks have mobilized to engage legal associations, immigration advocacy groups, and Congress to challenge the fee, demand clarifications, or push for exemptions.
What Founders Fear Next: The Shoe That Might Still Drop
The $100,000 fee feels like a big shock. But founders increasingly worry about further moves that could compound vulnerability. These are the plausible “next shoes”:
A. Restrictive Selection & Prioritization Filters
The administration may introduce skill- or wage-based caps or prioritization for certain sectors, sidelining small startups in favor of legacy corporates or national priority domains. Some preview: shifting selection criteria from lottery to points system biased toward high salaries.
B. Additional Hidden Fees or Retroactive Clauses
Future provisions might require additional processing fees, audits, or retroactive assessments. Founders worry about hidden triggers that penalize past filings.
C. Travel / Re-entry Restrictions
Even existing visa holders may face new travel restrictions, reentry protocols, or border scrutiny. Founders with frequent travel may be trapped or denied return, complicating international scaling.
D. Harsher Enforcement / Audit Regimes
Heightened scrutiny, revocation of visas, aggressive audits of visa compliance (e.g. benching rules, work schedules) may become weaponized. Founders may be exposed to compliance traps.
E. Curtailment of Startup-Entrepreneur Visas
Programs like the International Entrepreneur Rule or similar startup visa experiments could be rolled back, limiting future pathways for founders not tied to H-1B.
F. Retrospective Conditions on Grants or Subsidies
Grants, equity incentives, or state support programs might start conditioning eligibility on visa status or citizenship-anchored participation — marginalizing immigrant-led startups.
G. Dynamic Expulsion of Guest Workers in Downturns
In recession cycles, policy may enable rapid revocation or forced return of visa workers, reducing flexibility for startups to scale or survive downturns.
H. Regional or State-Level Visa Barriers
States or local governments may impose more restrictive licensure, local registration, or compliance burdens on foreign-founded ventures.
The worry is not hypothetical — the sudden fee feels like a test, a first step. Founders fear further layers unleashed unpredictably.
Ecosystem Fragility: Why Startups Hurt Most
Startups are uniquely exposed in this environment. Several structural factors magnify the risk:
Tight Margins & Minimal Buffer
Most early-stage startups run lean capital and burn rate calculations assume low regulatory or immigration friction. An extra $100K per hire upends hiring models and runway assumptions.
High Dependence on Technical Talent
Many startups depend on scarce specialized technical skills sourced globally. Domestic pipeline cannot always meet niche needs. Visa restrictions disproportionately hurt these skill gaps.
Founder-visibility & Co-location Needs
Startups often require founders who co-locate, pitch, network in person. Visa certainty affects team formation, investor travel, and strategic presence.
Investor & Term Sheet Vulnerability
Investors view visa risk as a material risk. Term sheets may include clauses limiting reliance on visa-dependent founders or restricting dilution if immigration failure occurs.
Timing & Growth Pressures
Many growth milestones (funding, milestones, scaling) align with multi-year horizons. Visa instability interrupts mid-course and derails scaling plans.
Limited Legal & HR Resources
Unlike large firms, startups often lack in-house immigration expertise, compliance infrastructure, or legal reserves to weather policy shocks.
Voice & Advocacy Weakness
Large tech players can lobby, hire policy teams, negotiate exemptions. Startups cannot. When changes come, they bear the burden disproportionately.
Case Vignettes & Anecdotes (Synthesized from Early Reports)
-
A mid-stage startup in AI paused hiring two senior engineers originally planned as H-1B candidates; instead moved to outsourcing in Canada.
-
A founder on H-1B was advised by counsel to avoid international travel until rules clarify, disrupting investor roadshows.
-
Some venture funds began pushing portfolio companies to pre-file or accelerate visa applications ahead of deadlines.
-
In Canada, tech incubators began marketing visa-safe startup acceleration programs to U.S. founders impacted by the fee shock.
These examples show adaptation under duress, but also underscore the stress, uncertainty, and gap between policy and practice.
What Founders & Ecosystem Players Can Do Now
While founders cannot control government decrees, they can hedge, plan, and influence. Here’s a proactive playbook:
-
Audit visa exposure & prioritization
Map out which roles, hires, or functions rely on H-1B or foreign talent. Prioritize critical hires and defensible positions. -
Accelerate filings and lock in pre-change status
Where possible, accelerate visa application filings before stricter rules fully kick in, to gain grandfathering or safe harbor. -
Diversify geographic presence
Establish startup operations in more immigration-friendly jurisdictions (Canada, UK, Singapore) as backup or dual base. -
Pursue alternate visa routes
Explore O-1, L-1, entrepreneur parole, investor visas, or global transfer paths for critical hires. -
Strengthen legal and compliance frameworks
Invest now in immigration counsel, scenario planning, and compliance to survive scrutiny. -
Incorporate visa risk in fundraising & terms
Negotiate with investors to include visa risk caps or contingencies, ensure capital cushions for immigration shocks. -
Engage policy & advocacy coalitions
Partner with founder associations, immigration nonprofits, industry groups to lobby Congress, raise media awareness, and seek carveouts. -
Build local hiring and training pipelines
Over time, invest in local university partnerships, apprenticeship paths, or remote/hybrid models less reliant on visa hires. -
Maintain founder mobility & contingency options
Keep passports, trappings, backup plans for founder relocation, exit alternatives, or re-incorporation if needed. -
Share signals & intelligence across founder networks
The more founders share policy, legal, and compliance intelligence, the faster the community adapts or pressures regulators.
What to Watch: Future Signals That Warn Another Drop
For those watching closely, these indicators may signal further shocks ahead:
-
Legislative proposals to overhaul skilled worker visa quotas, selection criteria, or eligibility rules
-
Introduction of retroactive visa compliance audits or audits of past filings
-
Border or reentry rule changes for H-1B holders (travel bans or increased scrutiny)
-
Department of Homeland Security or USCIS memos tightening discretionary denials or revocations
-
Federal executive orders narrowing categories of visa eligibility (e.g. limiting STEM or tech roles)
-
Changes to Optional Practical Training (OPT), J-1 waivers, or other student-to-work visa bridges
-
Court rulings or legal challenges that restrict visa pathways
-
Narrowing of startup visa or entrepreneur parole rules
-
Treasury or IRS rules linking foreign ownership or visa status to funding eligibility or tax incentives
When one sees a sudden wave of regulatory memos, budget rider amendments, or executive orders targeting “skilled worker programs,” founders should interpret them as warning signs.
Expect Volatility, Plan for the Unknown
The $100,000 H-1B fee was not just a shock — for many founders, it felt like the first knock in a longer sequence. In a policy climate increasingly hostile to immigration uncertainty, startup ecosystems that survive are those that not only adapt but hedge, diversify, and demand more stable grounds.
Yes — there may be another shoe about to drop. Whether it’s stricter selection rules, travel bans, retroactive audits, or new visa restrictions, the landscape is volatile. But founders armed with flexibility, legal horsepower, geographic optionality, and community intelligence have a better shot at navigating the shockwaves.
